Masud Khan (1924–1989) was an eminent and, ultimately, scandalous Indian-born, British psychoanalyst. From August 1967 to March 1980, he wrote his Work Books, a diary in thirty-nine volumes, containing observations and reflections on his own life, the world of psychoanalysis, his evolving theoretical formulations, Western culture, and the turbulent social and political developments of the time.
In this volume, comprising the first fourteen Work Books spanning August 1967 to January 1972, readers will find fascinating entries on Khan’s colleague and mentor Donald Winnicott and other well-known analysts of the period, including Anna Freud. Khan’s unique charm extended to celebrity social circles, with cultural figures such as Julie Andrews, the Redgraves, and Henri Cartier-Bresson featuring in these pages of his diary.
This unique, first-person account of a particularly fertile period of European and American intellectual and cultural society is an absolute must-read for those interested in psychoanalysis, history, or biography.
Jill Savege Scharff, M.D., FABP, International Psychotherapy Institute and co-author of The Interpersonal Unconscious, Winner of The Sigourney Award 2021 –
‘Here’s an unusual read, an incredible opportunity for access to the inner world of a brilliant and controversial psychoanalyst. Hopkins and Kuchuck’s scholarship and persistence against the odds bring us into Masud Khan’s private self as revealed in his diaries […] This book will be a treasure trove for scholars of mid-twentieth century psychoanalysis. As for the rest of us, who wouldn’t want to read the diaries of a man who ‘dares to say and think anything’?’
Glen O. Gabbard, MD, Clinical Professor of Psychiatry, Baylor College of Medicine –
‘Psychoanalysts have long been aware of the fact that extraordinary intelligence and alarming corruption can co-exist in the same individual. However, the case of Masud Khan is truly extraordinary. He combined erudition and charm with thoroughgoing contempt. The psychoanalytic profession owes a deep debt of gratitude to Steven Kuchuck and Linda Hopkins, who systematically collected Khan’s papers so that we can study them for ourselves.’
Professor Estela V. Welldon, Emeritus Consultant Psychiatrist in Psychotherapy, Tavistock and Portman NHS Trust –
‘Although a brilliant and charming man, and an excellent horse rider, [Masud Khan] also caused great distress to many colleagues. These beautifully edited Work Books offer a rare glimpse into the mind of a complicated psychoanalyst. We have much to learn from Khan about how to be a human being and, moreover, how not to be.’
Michael Eigen, PhD, author of The Challenge of Being Human, The Sensitive Self and The Psychoanalytic Mystic –
‘What a privilege to have access to Masud Khan’s Work Books. They are raw, insightful, sharply charged perceptions of life in progress filled with social commentary, psychoanalytic vision, irony and horror. His criticism of colleagues, society and world pull no punches, yet a profound sense of Beauty and appreciation of the best in us come through. He has a special gift for ‘nooks and crannies’ of experience as well as pulsating depths. Thanks to Linda Hopkins and Steven Kuchuck for the treasure they helped mediate.’
Deborah Anna Luepnitz, PhD, Institute for Relational Psychoanalysis of Philadelphia –
‘Jacques Lacan said famously that the psychoanalyst must be ‘a man of letters.’ Masud Khan was as literate as any analyst of his time, and readers interested in the history of psychoanalysis will find a treasure trove here. Following a fascinating introduction by the editors, the Work Books reveal Khan at his vituperative best, with flashes of prescience and wit. They remind us, too, of things we might like to forget about our impossible profession.’
Susie Orbach, psychoanalyst and author of The Impossibility of Sex and Bodies –
‘Khan’s workbooks are fascinating. They are strangely akin to a stream of consciousness in which the writer argues with his longings, hubris, disappointments, hurts, exuberances while engaging with the key figures in psychoanalysis. This crucial period in the field expands its understandings of the private self – of which Khan was a prime theorist – and of the quality of relatedness. We are introduced to his wide philosophical readings, his knowledge of art and his struggles with friends, with his wife and with psychoanalytic colleagues. Compelling.’
Joyce Slochower, PhD, ABPP –
‘Linda Hopkins and Steven Kuchuck’s indefatigable commitment and careful scholarship introduce us to Khan’s long-awaited workbooks. Their meticulous scholarship clarifies Khan’s sometimes confusing allusions while also protecting the integrity of the document. This volume gives us a fascinating window into – among many things – Winnicott’s own thinking and personhood; Khan’s complex and often contradictory psychology; British psychoanalytic politics; Khan’s personal relationships with many prominent psychoanalysts […] along with a window into the development of Khan’s thinking. A delicious, provocative, sometimes disturbing, and utterly satisfying volume.’
Oliver James, Relational Psychotherapist, The Bowlby Centre –
‘In this unique record of grandiose omnipotence mixed with true scholarship, Khan exposes far more of himself than he realizes. There are so many intriguing theories here. Alas, his intellectual musings do not translate into the gold of insight: he remains trapped in a fantasy of his superiority and the reality of solipsism; despite all his cleverness and knowledge, without self-awareness.’
Michaela Chamberlain, BJP, 2023 –
‘Hopkins and Kuchuck have managed to produce a compilation of writing that is cohesive and captivating, even with having to heavily edit out all of Khan’s clinical work and providing pointers and explanations so that those new to Khan’s work can drop instantly into Khan’s world. […] Every reader of this book will be immensely grateful to Hopkins and Kuchuck for their painstaking work and courage in pushing against the institutional obstacles so that they can form their own opinion of Khan and his work, rather than be infantilised by the institutions who were part of his ‘fall’.’
Candace Orcutt, New Psychotherapist, 2023 –
‘Diary of a Fallen Psychoanalyst: The Work Books of Masud Khan, edited by Linda Hopkins and Steven Kuchuck, is a literary achievement that repairs a gap in the narrative of analytic memory. This extraordinary editorial accomplishment invites the reader to share, in Khan’s own words, the day-to-day observations of a complex, controversial and largely forgotten analytic celebrity. […] A review of the Work Books must include an assessment of the impeccable editing. I found that the close attention needed to write this review made me even more aware of the skillfulness of the unintrusive editing that retains the flow and integrity of the Work Books. […] It is hoped that, in time, these Work Books will help to bring about restoration of Khan’s profound and pertinent contributions to contemporary psychoanalytic thought.’
Nirav Soni, The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, March 2024 –
‘Linda Hopkins and Steven Kuchuck have clearly worked very hard on this edition of the Work Books and it shows. […] Hopkins and Kuchuck have used a light hand editorially and have not burdened the text with excessive annotation. […] I am grateful to Hopkins and Kuchuck for giving us the opportunity to live more deeply in the mind of this profoundly paradoxical person.’
Candace Orcutt, The Psychoanalytic Review, 2023 –
‘Diary of a Fallen Psychoanalyst: The Work Books of Masud Khan, edited by Linda Hopkins and Steven Kuchuck, is a literary achievement that repairs a gap in the narrative of analytic memory. This extraordinary editorial accomplishment invites the reader to share, in Khan’s own words, the day-to-day observations of a complex, controversial and largely forgotten analytic celebrity. […] it is hoped that, in time, these Work Books will help to bring about restoration of Khan’s profound and pertinent contributions to contemporary psychoanalytic thought.’