SEND US A MESSAGE
Whether you’re looking for answers, would like to solve a problem, or just want to let us know how we did, we are always happy to hear from you.
– The Analyst as ‘Boundary Artist’: How Does Winnicott’s Theoretical and Clinical Work Affect Our Perception of Boundaries in the Therapeutic Relationship? by Antoine Gordon
– A Clinical Psychologist as a beginning Buddhist: A Personal Reflection on the Buddhist Path by George Lee
– Revisiting Demeter and Persephone
– Revisiting Demeter: Towards Reconceptualising Maternal Subjectivity and Erotics by Christina Moutsou and Ros Mayo
– Revisiting Persephone: Towards Reconceptualising Female Subjectivity and Erotics by Christina Moutsou and Ros Mayo
– A case study of a psychotherapist’s narrative account of significant relationship breakdown and the perceived impact on his clinical work by Karen Lubner and Maria Luca
– Management of Deradicalisation in the UK: Reflections of a Clinical Psychologist by Feryad A Hussain
– Resilience through an LGBT lens: growing up as a gay man and becoming a community leader by Ian M Adams
– An Englishman in New York: Reflections on loneliness by Martin Milton
– Writing that changes thinking: Paul Monette’s Becoming a man: Half a life story by Martin Milton
– Chessick, R. D. Apologia Pro Vita Mea: An Intellectual Odyssey. Abingdon: Routledge. 2018
Reviewed by Brett Kahr
The Journal of Psychological Therapies (formerly the Journal of Psychotherapy and Counselling Psychology Reflections) is sponsored by Regent’s University London’s School of Psychotherapy. It is for all psychotherapists, counsellors, and mental health professionals who are interested in open debate and reflective thinking around the philosophy, theory, and practice of therapy and counselling.
Reasons to subscribe:
– An international peer-reviewed journal that welcomes contributions from all countries and cultures;
– An inclusive, non-doctrinaire journal with a pluralistic approach;
– A forum for open debate underpinned with academic rigour and reflective thinking;
– A home for intriguing articles based on both quantitative and qualitative methods;
– A unique space for critical, broad, and experimental discussion on psychotherapy and counselling.
The annual subscription includes two printed issues a year and includes complimentary online access from Ingenta Connect to current and past issues.
Editor: Maria Luca
Managing Editor: Helen Cowie
Book Reviews and Series Editor: Jane Wynn Owen
Editorial Assistant: Shirley Paul
Marie Adams, Metanoia Institute, London, UK
Meg-John Barker, Open University, London, UK
Michael Berry, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
James Davies, University of Roehampton, UK
Lisa Doodson, Regent’s University London, UK
Stelios Gkouskos, University of East London, UK
Ralph Goldstein, British Psychological Society’s Register of Psychologists specialising in Psychotherapy [with senior status], UK
Brett Kahr, Tavistock Relationships, Tavistock Institute of Medical Psychology and Regent’s University London, UK
Elaine Kasket, Regent’s University London, UK
Desa Markovic, Regent’s University London, UK
Martin Milton, Regent’s University London, UK
Lyndsey Moon, University of Roehampton, UK
Terence Nice, University of Kent and Regent’s University London, UK
Christina Richards, Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
Michael Worrell, Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust, UK
INTERNATIONAL EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARD
Geoff Denham, Castlemaine Hospital, VIC, Australia
Andrew Geeves, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
Theodoros Giovazolias, University of Crete, Greece
Dennis Greenwood, University of Brighton, UK
Martin Lečbych, Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Uherský Brod, Czech Republic
John Nuttall, Regent’s University London, UK
Andrea Sabbadini, British Psychoanalytical Society, London, UK
Carla Willig, City, University of London, London, UK
Journal of Psychological Therapies is an international peer-reviewed journal, underpinned by the aspiration for a non-doctrinaire, pluralistic attitude to psychotherapy and counselling psychology. It aims to provide a forum for open debate and encourages submissions from different traditions, epistemological positions and theoretical modalities enabling the development of a more open, reflective thinking to philosophy, theory and practice of psychotherapy and counselling psychology. The Journal of Psychological Therapies encourages critical, broad and experimental interpositions in discussions on psychotherapy and counselling psychology. It tends to transcend the methodological and metatheoretical divisions. We welcome submissions using both quantitative and qualitative methods, including ethnographic, autobiographical, and single patient or organisational case studies.
GUIDELINES FOR SUBMITTING A PAPER TO THE JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL THERAPIES
– In preparing your submission, please refer to the style guide below.
– Please make sure your full contact details are visible on the outside of all documents you are sending to Editors.
– Papers are accepted for consideration on condition that you will accept the following conditions. We ask authors to assign the rights of copyright in the manuscript they contribute.
– We welcome submissions on any topic within psychotherapy and counselling psychology that considers the remit of the journal and that it is inclusive of the academic community at large.
– Contributions to Journal of Psychological Therapies must report original research and will be subjected to review by referees at the discretion of the Editorial Office.
– We welcome new or recent books which are relevant to the focus of the journal and which you consider would be useful to review for readers.
– Journal policy prohibits an author from submitting the same manuscript for consideration by another journal and does not allow publication of a manuscript that has been published in whole or in part by another journal.
Important note: Manuscripts must adhere to the ethical guidelines for both research and practice of UKCP, BPS, HCPC & BACP.
– Language: Papers are accepted only in English. British English spelling and punctuation is preferred. Non-discriminatory language is mandatory. Sexist or racist terms must not be used.
– Referencing: All manuscripts should follow the Phoenix referencing guidelines. Please click here to download them.
– Abstracts: Structured Abstracts of no more than 250 words are required for all papers submitted. Authors should supply three to six keywords.
– Headings: Section headings should be concise.
– Word count: A typical manuscript will be 1,500-2,500 words, including references. Longer contributions of 3,500-6,000 words, (27-30 double spaced pages including references) may be published where inclusion of data (e.g., excerpts from interviews) warrant it. Papers that greatly exceed this will be critically reviewed with respect to length. Authors should include a word count with their manuscript. The word count (which includes all text including the abstract, manuscript, notes, tables, figures, etc.) should appear at the end of the manuscript.
– Font: All manuscripts must be typed in 12-point font in Arial and double-spaced throughout including the reference section, with wide (3 cm) margins. All pages must be numbered.
Manuscripts should be compiled in the following order:
– Title of manuscript
– Author(s) name(s) and title(s)
– Keywords (no more than six)
– Correspondence/contact details including author(s) affiliation(s)
– Main text
– Appendices (as appropriate)
– Table(s) with caption(s) (on individual pages)
– Author(s) biographical outline (50 to 100 words)
– Please supply in a separate file information about your research interests/specialisations – up to five.
Two separate manuscripts must be submitted.
– The first version must be a complete version containing all the above together with confirmation in a separate file confirming that the manuscript is not under consideration or submitted to another journal. Use the following statement: I confirm that the manuscript submitted, title:…. is not under consideration or submitted to another journal.
– The second version must be entitled ‘For blind review’ and must not contain the author(s)’ name(s) or contact details or any identifiable author(s) information (refer to APA guidelines). This will allow for the second version to be sent anonymously to reviewers.
FIRING THE MIND MEMBERS